PUK Initiates Legal Action Against Three Lawmakers Over Parliament Session

The logo of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)
The logo of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)

At a Glance

  • The PUK says it will pursue legal action against three of its lawmakers who attended the November 4 parliamentary session.

  • The party accuses the lawmakers of violating the PUK parliamentary bloc's collective position.

  • PUK political bureau member Rizgar Haji Hama says complaints will be filed with the Independent High Electoral Commission and the Electoral Judicial Panel.

  • The party also intends to take the matter to Iraq's Federal Supreme Court.


The Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) says it has begun legal proceedings against three of its lawmakers who attended the Kurdistan Parliament session on November 4, when the parliament elected its presidency board despite the party's opposition to the proceedings.


Key Statements and Focus Areas

Rizgar Haji Hama: PUK Will Pursue Legal Action

Speaking to Channel 8, Rizgar Haji Hama, a PUK Political Bureau member and the party's election office supervisor, said the three lawmakers had violated the collective position of the PUK parliamentary bloc by participating in the session.

He said:

“The PUK will never relinquish these three seats in the Kurdistan Parliament.”

Hama outlined the party's position:

  • The three lawmakers broke the collective decision of the PUK parliamentary bloc.

  • He argued that election legislation restricts lawmakers from switching parliamentary blocs or changing their affiliation until a prime minister is elected.

  • He accused the three lawmakers of violating regulations issued by the electoral commission.

  • The PUK intends to file legal complaints against them with the Independent High Electoral Commission and the Electoral Judicial Panel.

  • He said describing themselves as independents would not exempt the lawmakers from potential legal consequences.

Dispute Over Electoral Support

Hama also challenged the lawmakers' electoral mandate, arguing that they would not have secured parliamentary seats had they contested the election outside the PUK's electoral list.

He claimed that the electoral threshold for securing a seat in Erbil Governorate exceeded 18,000 votes, while the three lawmakers collectively received approximately 17,000 votes.

PUK Plans to Take Case to Federal Supreme Court

Hama said the party's legal measures would not be limited to complaints before the electoral authorities.

He indicated that the PUK also intends to refer the matter to Iraq's Federal Supreme Court, expressing confidence that the court would examine the case and issue a ruling.

He cited previous legal challenges by the party, including efforts that resulted in changes to the Kurdistan Region's election law and a reduction in the number of quota seats.


The PUK's announcement marks another escalation in the political dispute surrounding the Kurdistan Parliament's November 4 session.

The session resulted in the election of Vala Fareed as Speaker, Rami Nuri as Deputy Speaker and Mona Qahwachi as Parliamentary Secretary. The three candidates received 52 votes from lawmakers present.

The PUK had opposed the session and called on political parties and lawmakers not to participate. However, three lawmakers affiliated with the party attended, prompting the party to accuse them of breaking its parliamentary bloc's collective position.

Hama said the PUK would pursue the matter through the relevant electoral and judicial institutions, maintaining that the lawmakers' participation had violated electoral regulations.

The party's position also raises questions over the legal status of lawmakers who act independently of their parliamentary bloc and the extent to which party decisions can be enforced through electoral law.

However, the allegations and legal arguments presented by Hama have not, at this stage, been established through a ruling by the relevant authorities. The three lawmakers' responses to the accusations were not included in the statements provided.

FYI

The dispute highlights the broader struggle over parliamentary representation and political authority following the resumption of the Kurdistan Parliament after nearly two years of inactivity. It also raises a legal distinction between party discipline, parliamentary bloc affiliation and the individual mandate of elected lawmakers. Iraq's electoral framework provides for complaints to be considered by the Independent High Electoral Commission, with appeals falling under the jurisdiction of the Electoral Judicial Panel. Any constitutional challenge would involve a separate role for the Federal Supreme Court. The outcome could have implications beyond the three lawmakers, particularly for relations between political parties and the functioning of the Kurdistan Parliament.

Dive Deeper: Handpicked Stories for You

Follow Channel8 for continuous updates:

Talabani Orders PUK To Form Local Public Service Committees

PUK President Announces Withdrawal From KRG Government, Rejects Parliament Session Outcomes

U.S. Supports ‘Resilient’ Kurdistan, Urges Swift Action on Institutions

Mohammed Jangadost

Sun Nov 08 2026

Loading related news...